🔗 Share this article

Turns out Ruben Amorim endured losing against Grimsby. He weathered a decisive continental showpiece against a particularly poor Spurs sides for many years. He could survive home defeats to domestic rivals, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, squandering the team's most promising homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, calling his team the poorest the club has ever seen. But there was one adversary against whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to engage. You come at Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, similar to numerous top-flight right-back in Blackburn’s championship campaign, Amorim came at Jason Wilcox and seems to have failed. The most casual observer can see the paradoxical situation: a coach who frequently berated at his players for failing in individual battles crumbling when confronted by the intense pressure and animal charisma of one of the Premier League’s most feared football executives.

And frankly, this whole painful saga appears to portray the director in a whole new light. It may have been easy, given his brief stint in a similar role with the Saints, to regard him as merely a drudge within the club's structure: an individual who owed his position as much to his close relationship with his former boss Omar Berrada rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong we all were. In brilliantly outsmarting United’s feted head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate Dan Ashworth earlier, he has proved himself to be among the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind of which United’s mid-table rivals are now rightly wary.

The Strategic Clash Regarding Formation and Ideology

To illustrate, this was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the hierarchy that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim in the first place, was instrumental in trying to persuade Amorim to abandon his favored 3-4-3. Naturally, these entreaties met a certain resistance. However, such directives carry more weight when issued by a man with the impeccable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a role in a championship team decades past.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox might agree to outline his thought processes publicly. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is walking away with a full payout, with no compensation reduction clause in place. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks in public, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals in football – individuals such as him – simply operate at a level beyond our own prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive would be high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Wanting is not the same as being ready to receive.

The Supreme Authority In the Throne

But of course, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we overlook the true genius behind the modern United throne. The director is, after all, simply carrying out the commands of his ultimate superior the billionaire owner, who in private has made very clear his desire for a four-man defense. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for the club to embrace analytics and metrics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit early in his investment, he declared that the team's approach of play “shall be decided by this group”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is an expert in this technical football matters, leveraging his previous experience in petrochemicals and yachting. Most importantly he is immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are the best of us: more insightful, more wise, strategically brilliant, fundamentally better. Who else could one trust to manage an enlightened programme of austerity, the construction of a modern arena that appears a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

The Modern Soccer Hierarchy: Executives Above Managers

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent in top-tier of the game. For decades, teams mistakenly delegated major sporting choices to subordinate staff such as coaches, talent spotters – players themselves. Maybe previously possible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with a philosophy and energy to join a club and implement their plan supported to fruition. Yet how many companies have these guys set up? What number of large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Far preferable to invest genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to decide the strategy in the boardroom and hire someone who can tailor their methods to suit. If managers were once chefs, they are now more akin to delivery personnel: not creating the product, but still finally accountable if it arrives cold or fails of the box.

In the meantime, a coach's role has become less about defining the vision and more about selling it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the visible figurehead of an organisation they can do little to change. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of literal children into Europe and secures two medium-sized trophies, and effectively is dismissed for talking. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined whereas the people who hired him live to blunder indefinitely.

A Modern Corporate Game: Accountability for the Coaches

And perhaps in a small way this represents neoliberalism in action: the rise of a gilded elite who are infallible, whose choices are always sacrosanct, whose errors can invariably be resolved by sacking without explanation. Hire the 3-4-3 coach and then dismiss him for playing excessively that system. Hire the process guy and later bin him for requiring excessive time. And most importantly show gratitude; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for your new player acquisitions, for the reality that the adults – however well qualified – remain in control.